More guns? Get real, NRA!

DSCF0122Normal service is resumed. This blog, rudely interrupted by crazed folk shouting in panic that the end of the world was upon us, took to its silo but has now emerged, ashamed that it ran scared in the face of something as harmless as a mere apocalpyse.
And to what has it emerged? Something far scarier – the National Rifle Association, no less. A couple of years ago, in an earlier draft of The Girl with the Haunting Smile, I said there were only three things I didn’t like about America. One of them was the gun laws. I’ve forgotten the other two, which proves what a big fan of the US I am.

But even I didn’t believe this great country could produce such a nut as Wayne LaPierre, one of the NRA’s top dogs, whose response to the Sandy Hook massacre of young kids and teachers was that “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”. The only way? Really? How about stopping the bad guy from having a gun in the first place?

If LaPierre’s vomit-inducing statement is the “meaningful contribution” the NRA promised after Sandy Hook, God help us all. Yet we shouldn’t really be surprised. LaPierre is a lobbyist by trade and the NRA is known for its fearsome lobbying activities on Capitol Hill. The ready availability of guns will be curtailed over its dead body (a consummation devoutly to be wished).

What gives the NRA such influence is the antiquated Second Amendment to the Constitution, which states: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. This reference to militia and free state make it clear what the lawmakers of the era had in mind. They were making provision for a citizens’ army, not issuing a license to kill to deranged individuals. But the Second Amendment still stands and is a formidable barrier to gun law reform. Until, miraculously, it is scrapped or reworked, the awful events of Sandy Hook will be repeated and LaPierre, who called for armed guards to be put in place at every US school, will be able to say sanctimoniously, “I warned you, didn’t I?”

We Brits also had a dreadful school massacre (Dunblane in 1996) but at least it was followed by a vigorous public debate and two Firearms Acts which made it illegal to possess handguns. If we’d had an NRA, we’d still be debating.

Advertisements

About Richard Louden

Maybe it was because languages were my thing but I loved writing at school and I've loved it ever since. Obviously, I hope others will enjoy reading what I write but, now that I am turning my hand to novels, what matters most to me is to write what, as a reader, I would like to read. As a journalist with UK papers, I've written widely on education, business, sport and law. In the creative writing field, I've written the scripts of two TV dramas (BBC and ITV), contributed sketches to TV and radio comedy shows and had short stories published in national anthologies. That doesn’t make me a novelist but I hope it gives me a push in the right direction.

Posted on December 23, 2012, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. As an American, I’d like to respectively challenge your post.

    My problem with the whole debate is this: laws can’t diminish the evil in a person’s heart. Yes, laws and legislation help restrict/control evil, but they don’t eliminate criminals with guns or someone with a desire to do harm to acquire a weapon illegally. If memory serves me correctly, some of the other horrible school massacres were in European countries with gun bans. By the way, that was not an American snub on Europe, just an observation.

    Now before you label me as a card carrying NRA member, I don’t think the answer is what LaPierre proposed either. But until we as a society begin to delve into the real problem of why human beings, myself included, are inclined to evil, then we’re merely putting a Band-aid on a cancerous tumor.

    • Thank you for your helpful comments. I agree with you 100% that the root of the issue lies in human nature, not in the weapons we carry. The problem is that human nature takes ages to change, if it can ever be done. At least gun control, if there was goodwill on all sides, could be achieved within a relatively short timescale.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: